The ability to make change happen is one of the most important capabilities in HR. Yet we need to rethink how we approach change management in HR.
Organisations are dealing with new technology, changing expectations, new ways of working and constant pressure to adapt. We can create excellent people strategies, policies and HR products, but they have little value if we cannot help people use them and work differently as a result.
This should be an area in which HR brings something distinctive. We understand human beings. We know that people are not entirely rational, that behaviour is shaped by habits, relationships, identity, emotion and the environment around us. We understand that people need trust, involvement and a sense of control — and that even a change which looks entirely sensible on paper can feel threatening to those experiencing it.
Yet we do not always bring this understanding to the way we manage change.
Traditional change management is based on a rational model. We explain the business case, create a compelling vision, secure senior sponsorship, provide training and align systems and incentives.
These things may help, but change is also emotional, social and deeply human.
People are not only asking, “Does this make sense?” They are asking: “What will I lose? Will I still be good at my job? Will I have any say? Will this create more work? Can I trust the people leading it? And will this change last?”
If we understand this, we will design change differently.
We often describe these reactions as resistance, as though they reveal a difficult attitude. But resistance is usually self-protection. Even positive change can involve loss. People may lose familiar routines, relationships, confidence, status or control.
We should become curious about resistance rather than trying to overcome it. What is somebody worried about losing? What feels difficult or threatening? What do they understand about the practical reality that the project team may have missed?
Listening to apparent resistance does not mean everyone has a veto, but people are more likely to engage when they feel heard and can influence how the change happens.
This is why we need to move from doing change to people to creating it with them.
Co-creation does not mean asking 300 people to design everything. It means involving enough of the people affected to understand their world and give them genuine influence over the solution.
The people doing the work can spot impractical assumptions and unintended consequences before we launch a perfect solution that nobody wants. When people help create something, they are also more likely to support it.
We also need to rethink the scale of change. In HR we do love a change programme with multiple actions and workstreams but change is more likely to take hold when the first step feels small and manageable.
Instead of asking every manager to transform how they lead, we could ask a small group to try one five-minute check-in. Instead of replacing an entire talent process, we could invite managers to spend an hour discussing their people without forms or ratings.
Shrinking the first step does not mean shrinking the ambition. It creates a realistic way into the change.
This is why pilots matter.
A pilot allows us to say: “We think this might work, but we want to find out.” It shows us what creates confusion, what support people need and where the idea must change. It also creates practical evidence, credible stories and confidence.
We need to become more comfortable with imperfection. Organisations rarely change in a neat, linear sequence. Priorities shift, people respond differently and unexpected consequences emerge. Our role is not to control every step. It is to help the organisation learn, adapt and adjust.
That also means letting go of the idea that we must bring everyone with us from the beginning.
Change rarely starts with the most reluctant people. It begins with those who are curious, frustrated with the current approach and willing to try something different.
We need to go where the energy is.
Start with early adopters. Let them shape and test the idea. Learn from their experience and help them share it. Their success will often attract the people in the middle more effectively than another round of persuasion from HR.
This is the shift from creating a change programme to creating a movement. Programmes are designed and controlled centrally. Movements grow through people. They begin with a shared problem, spread through relationships and gain energy when people see that something better is possible.
Perhaps the most useful question is not, “How do we get everyone to adopt this change?”
It is: “How can we make it easier, safer and more worthwhile for people to take the first step?”
Who already wants this? Who could help us shape it? What is the smallest useful version we could test? How will we learn from what happens?
HR should be brilliant at change management because we understand the people experiencing it. But that means applying what we know about trust, emotion, loss, relationships and human behaviour — not simply producing a plan and a communications cascade.
Sustainable change rarely begins with a perfect solution, a big launch or an inspiring video from the chief executive.
It begins with a small number of people helping to create something better, trying it in the real world and encouraging others to join them.
Our four-week virtual HR Business Partner Programme is designed for HRBPs and People Partners who want to strengthen their influence, credibility and strategic impact.
Through weekly live sessions with Lucy Adams and Karen Moran, you’ll explore practical consulting, coaching and facilitation skills, and learn how to navigate complex people decisions where there is no obvious right answer.
The programme also includes three months of membership to the Disruptive HR Club.
The third book in Lucy Adams’ series for forward-thinking HR professionals explores why HR struggles to influence leaders — and how to build the confidence, credibility and authority to create real change.
